Jim,

I'd second DF-4's comments.......my fuel flow tests were not precisely to the protocol you currently see being touted by faa/eaa/etc.......I don't have the exact figures right now but for the testing I did, I recall all configurations way more than 150%.

If you get less, you'd need to look for what is obstructing the flow; but, the kitfox system built to design specs should easily deliver to this standard.

Remember these are experimentals; and, what type of testing a person does on the fuel system is really up to the bulder - to do it so it is predictable and safe....what you find should be written into your aircraft POH. I included 10 degree nose down useful fuel, for example, in addition to level useful fuel.

Dave S
KF7 Trigear
912ULS Warp
St Paul, MN