Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Yaw Stability

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member av8rps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Junction City, WI
    Posts
    680

    Default Re: Yaw Stability

    Nice job on those tail feathers Larry. I like the shape. My Highlander has a tail much like that. But honestly, I don't notice much difference between that and my Kitfox 4 for effectiveness. But it does look cool

    Going back to the original question posted on this thread, early Avid and Kitfoxes have much more adverse yaw than later Kitfoxes because by the time Kitfox made the model 4, they completely changed the control system (which is why you have to disconnect flaperons on the 4 and newer when folding wings, but you don't on the model 1-3 ), which for the 1st time on a Kitfox gave the flaperons differential like most GA aircraft have.

    Avid never changed theirs like kitfox did, mostly because the Avid's weren't as bad, probaby due to having a wing 2 ft shorter than the Kitfox. Although, Avid later offered a kit that added a bell crank to the existing control system, and that did improve their adverse yaw issues.

    I'm actually surprised a taller vertical and rudder alone fixes the adverse yaw issue, as adding differential to the control system would be a way better fix in my opinion. (Avid proved that with their bellcrank kit, as they never did increase their vertical fin height, and yet their latest airplanes flew really nice). BUT, adding differential AND increasing fin height would be best, like the 4 and newer Kitfox have. And they do fly nice...

    Funny thing is once you get used to flying the early models with all the yaw, it almost makes them more fun in my opinion. Using that yaw to your advantage, you can turn them on a dime. Plus, if you learn to fly one well, you can pretty much fly anything

  2. #2
    Senior Member av8rps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Junction City, WI
    Posts
    680

    Default Re: Yaw Stability

    To further explain the early model adverse yaw:

    In an early Kitfox, if you push the stick one direction, the aircraft will yaw in the other direction. Here's why: When you push the controls for full left aileron, the aileron on the right wing is deflected down lifting that panel up, but all the drag from the right aileron wants to pull the wing back. At the same time the left wing aileron is defected up (the same amount the rt aileron was deflected down), making the left wing go down (so you now have the roll of the aircraft), but because the left wing aileron is going up into somewhat disturbed air (being that it is right behind the wing trailing edge), the drag that should pull the left wing back isn't there. So the result is, you push the stick left and the airplane yaws to the right. The only way to make the aircraft yaw left is with the rudder. So whenever applying aileron you need to first apply rudder in the direction you want to go. Yup, thats an early Kitfox...

    So to now explain the 2:1 flaperon differential change that was done with the model 4 and newer Kitfoxes:

    A differential aileron system means that an upward moving aileron moves twice as far up as the opposite aileron moves down (so the drag from the top aileron "pulls" that wing back, rather than you having to use so much rudder to yaw the airplane) so the result is considerably less adverse yaw, or less rudder input required to keep the aircraft in coordinated flight.

    The flaperon concept the Kitfox uses is great, but due to having such a long aileron that flies under the wing in clean air, when it is deflected it can cause serious drag on a wing that a more conventional aileron mounted behind the trailing edge of the wing doesn't have. That's partly why the Cub and Taylorcraft have less adverse yaw.

    In fact, my Highlander, which in concept is really just a big Avid Flyer with standard ailerons and flaps (vs flaperons) has no issues with adverse yaw, and yet has no differential in the ailerons. But the ailerons are like the Cub and Taylorcraft, being mounted behind the trailing edge of the wing. So I would attribute its lack of adverse yaw more to having standard ailerons than I would the size of its vertical and rudder.

    Hopefully this helps to explain the whole Kitfox adverse yaw issue...

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    lexington, sc
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: Yaw Stability

    Thanks for the replies. Will the extended surface area for the elevator or rudder cause a flutter in the tail?

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Av8r3400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Merrill, WI
    Posts
    3,048

    Default Re: Yaw Stability

    At the speeds it will fly, I believe flutter to be unlikely with the mods I have done.

    However, before I share any dimensions of these mods I've made, I want to thoroughly test it to be sure.
    Av8r3400
    Kitfox Model IV
    The Mangy Fox
    912UL 105hp Zipper
    YouTube Videos

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •