Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Skyraider II kitfox cousin

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Eric Page's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Toledo, WA
    Posts
    881

    Default Re: Skyraider II kitfox cousin

    The issue is this: it's up to the builder to set the maximum gross weight on the airworthiness certificate application. If the inspector isn't intimately familiar with the type, he may just accept whatever the builder puts on the form as long as it seems reasonable for the plane he's inspecting. The fact that the SkyRaider you're looking at was issued an airworthiness certificate at 1,200#, and has been flown at that weight, does not necessarily mean that it's been engineered and modified properly for the higher weight.

    For example, I have a Series 5 Kitfox that's supposed to be 1,400#, but the later production units went up to 1,550#. I could easily list the higher weight on my airworthiness application and it's likely that no one would be the wiser. I'd get an airworthiness certificate at the higher weight just by declaring it so, and without making any of the necessary structural modifications. The airplane would look more useful on paper, but would it be safe?
    Eric Page
    Building: Kitfox 5 Safari | Rotax 912iS | Dynon HDX
    Member: EAA Lifetime, AOPA, ALPA
    ATP: AMEL | Comm: ASEL, Glider | ATCS: CTO
    Map of Landings

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Location
    Tupper Lake, New York
    Posts
    40

    Default Re: Skyraider II kitfox cousin

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Page View Post
    The issue is this: it's up to the builder to set the maximum gross weight on the airworthiness certificate application. If the inspector isn't intimately familiar with the type, he may just accept whatever the builder puts on the form as long as it seems reasonable for the plane he's inspecting. The fact that the SkyRaider you're looking at was issued an airworthiness certificate at 1,200#, and has been flown at that weight, does not necessarily mean that it's been engineered and modified properly for the higher weight.

    For example, I have a Series 5 Kitfox that's supposed to be 1,400#, but the later production units went up to 1,550#. I could easily list the higher weight on my airworthiness application and it's likely that no one would be the wiser. I'd get an airworthiness certificate at the higher weight just by declaring it so, and without making any of the necessary structural modifications. The airplane would look more useful on paper, but would it be safe?
    That makes sense I'm guessing that is what I am possibly seeing here. The 600lb useful load he's reporting definitely makes it more appealing to possible buyers than the 450lb it was probably actually designed at. Definitely gives you something to think about.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •