Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Classic Model 4 1200 vs Model 5

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Esser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    2,048

    Default Re: Classic Model 4 1200 vs Model 5

    I am at the forward limit of my C of G when solo on my Model 7 with a 914 and a constant speed prop. I also have an intercooler which the 914 pretty much NEEDS I don't think on a model IV there is much room to have a straight forward intercooler install.
    ------------------
    Josh Esser
    Flying SS7
    Rotax 914iS
    AirMaster Prop

    Edmonton, AB, CWL3

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Av8r3400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Merrill, WI
    Posts
    3,048

    Default Re: Classic Model 4 1200 vs Model 5

    Josh - I'll show you the weight and balance on the Mangy some time...
    Av8r3400
    Kitfox Model IV
    The Mangy Fox
    912UL 105hp Zipper
    YouTube Videos

  3. #3
    Senior Member av8rps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Junction City, WI
    Posts
    680

    Default Re: Classic Model 4 1200 vs Model 5

    The Model 4 is easier to balance with extra forward engine weight because the nose is so much shorter than later models that have the longer nose. In fact, a little more weight forward on a typical Model 4 would be a good thing.

  4. #4
    Senior Member HighWing's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Goodyear, AZ
    Posts
    1,743

    Default Re: Classic Model 4 1200 vs Model 5

    When building my second Model IV, I moved the 912 a bit forward with a new engine mount to help recover some of the baggage sack capacity I lost in the first one when I put all the fairings and gap seals in the empennage. When weighing for CG, I discovered I was very close to the forward limit. Thinking about it, I remembered when I was working at United Airlines on the ramp. This was shortly after the Arab Oil Embargo. It was determined then that Max fuel efficiency was flying with CG at close to the aft limit. Very often all luggage was loaded in the aft pit. And if not full, passengers were spaced to achieve an aft CG. I decided to put 5 lbs of lead in the tail pending a tailwheel upgrade. CG still a bit forward, but hopefully a flatter elevator and a bit more speed and efficiency - assuming a Kitfox is at least a tiny bit similar to a 747.
    Lowell Fitt
    Goodyear, AZ


    My You Tube Channel

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •