Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Hysol vs Superfill

  1. #1
    Senior Member JoeRuscito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    361

    Default Hysol vs Superfill

    Can someone please help explain to me the advantages/disadvantages of using either for things like the rudder/elevator tips. Is superfill just a weight advantage when used as a filler? I assume superfill is not as strong of a structural adhesive. Also do most people opt to use balsa instead of foam? What is the reasoning here, it sounds like balsa is a bit more durable? I'm not using oratex so heat isn't as issue.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Delta Whisky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Amissville, VA
    Posts
    638

    Default Re: Hysol vs Superfill

    Joe - you are correct, Superfill is a filler while Hysol is a structural adhesive. I'd rather sand and shape Superfill than Hysol, even when Hysol is loaded with micro-balloons. Superfill should never be used for anything that has to stay bonded together.



    As to foam vs. balsa wood - I used balsa. A personal decision as I find carving foam a tougher task: foam is too easy to carve; too easy to remove material that belongs there. It seems to suffer from "shop rash" a lot easier as well.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Desert Aire (Mattawa), WA
    Posts
    221

    Default Re: Hysol vs Superfill

    Hysol is for bonding and strength. Like JB Weld, another 2 part epoxy. Think of Superfil as a cosmetic finish putty. They work well together on the empennage tips. Shape and 'glue' the foam in place with Hysol. Shape the foam to about 1/8" undersize. Now use Hysol to build up and strengthen the foam over the entire finish surface. This will bond the foam to the airframe and create a durable 'eggshell'. After it is sanded with 80 grit, apply a thin layer of Superfil and finish sand. Done in this way, the foam is very light and made extremely durable. Remember, it all gets covered with fabric too. Using balsa instead of foam will produce the same results.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mapleton,UT
    Posts
    1,231

    Default Re: Hysol vs Superfill

    Use balsa and super fill. Balsa and superfill will hold up much better when you accidentally bump them, which you will building in a garage.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Desert Aire (Mattawa), WA
    Posts
    221

    Default Re: Hysol vs Superfill

    If you expect a lot of hangar rash, don't install the tips at all. They're cosmetic only. Or make them out of titanium

  6. #6
    Senior Member efwd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Yorba Linda, CA
    Posts
    2,824

    Default Re: Hysol vs Superfill

    Hangar Rash is inevitable. I made balsa wood flapperon tips. Sculpted art as far as I was concerned. I love the way they are shaped but I have rash and Im not even certain how it happens. I would buy the fiberglass flapperon tips if I did it again or I would just fill in the end of the flapperon smooth.
    Eddie Forward
    Flying
    SS7, 912iS, Garmin G3X

  7. #7
    Senior Member jiott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    2,966

    Default Re: Hysol vs Superfill

    In my opinion, the areas most vulnerable to hangar rash are the horizontal and elevator tips. I would recommend balsa in these areas. The top of the rudder and vertical stab, and flaperon tips are much less likely to get dinged and the foam as Floog describes, or the plastic flaperon tips are fine.
    Jim Ott
    Portland, OR
    Kitfox SS7 flying
    Rotax 912ULS

  8. #8
    Senior Member ken nougaret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    North Florida
    Posts
    778

    Default Re: Hysol vs Superfill

    Speaking of top of the rudder/vertical, that was the spot i had slight hanger/garage rash. I was backing my plane in the garage before lowering the tail on the trailer. Luckily it only lacked about 1/4" so it wasnt very noticable and i didnt have to repair. My preference was balsa wood that i used everywhere except the top of the rudder/vertical, where i used foam. I still recommend balsa.
    SS7 O-200 Whirlwind

  9. #9
    Senior Member aviator79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM
    Posts
    913

    Default Re: Hysol vs Superfill

    I did foam on the flaperons tips and top of the vertical stab/rudder and balsa at the horizontal stab and elevator tips like Jim describes. If I did it over again, I'm do balsa everywhere. If you sand through your super fill to the foam while shaping, you have to dig out the foam and re-fill with super fill, let it cure and resand. It's a huge time waster, and I did it more than once. You can sand down to the balsa and it will do just fine.
    --Brian
    Flying - S7SS

  10. #10
    Guy Buchanan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ramona, CA
    Posts
    119

    Default Re: Hysol vs Superfill

    You've already been set straight on Hysol vs Superfill. Definitely don't use Hysol for anything but adhesive, it's just too expensive. Use cheap epoxy filled with West Systems Microlight, or Superfill, whichever's cheaper. (You can even use Microlight with polyester, but you gotta be quick, and work in small batches.)

    Foam vs balsa depends on the foam. You can buy foam more dense than balsa, that will actually be stronger. (See Last-a-Foam, available in 10-25 pcf.) However any substrate, once shaped and filled, should be covered with glass cloth. Otherwise you've just got a ding machine you'll be forever patching. (Imagine a surfboard without fiberglass. Not good.) Once covered with glass you then fill the weave with micro or Superfill, sand, fair, and cover. Obviously you'll have to reduce the dimensions of the foam/balsa to account for the glass thickness. About .03" per 8 oz. layer should do it.
    Guy Buchanan
    San Diego, CA
    Deceased K-IV 1200 / 912uls / 70" Warp 3cs

    gebuchanan@cox.net

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •