Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: 915is Updates in the Kitfox?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    404

    Default Re: 915is Updates in the Kitfox?

    Well Keith - CPS (Califironia Power Systems now has it priced at $38,667 and it has been constantly going up prior to even one unit being delivered. Their Q&A also states the current version is only set up for variable (constant speed) prop. And they state maybe another year for a fixed pitch version.

    Pretty rich for the HP in my view!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    308

    Default Re: 915is Updates in the Kitfox?

    Ouch. That is up there in cost. I also noticed the main product page shows TBO at 1200 hrs, not 2000. That's a big difference.

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Av8r3400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Merrill, WI
    Posts
    3,048

    Default Re: 915is Updates in the Kitfox?

    IMO - Not even close to worth that kind of money.
    Av8r3400
    Kitfox Model IV
    The Mangy Fox
    912UL 105hp Zipper
    YouTube Videos

  4. #4
    Senior Member aviator79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM
    Posts
    913

    Default Re: 915is Updates in the Kitfox?

    The latest I heard was that a hydraulic Constant Speed Prop was required. I wonder if they'll extend the TBO after it acquires some service history. As it is, if you make an apples-to-apples comparison by assuming ~$10/hour in overhaul costs for the 800 hours you're losing, The cost compared to the rest of the rotax line is a staggering $46,667. I was hoping there would be a way to justify this engine on my plane, but it's looking bleak.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    471

    Default Re: 915is Updates in the Kitfox?

    Since I am in the market for a new flivver I am also weighing the different options. Edge Performance seems to be a better option if one wants power with light weight. It is an expensive engine also,and warranty might be something a buyer would have to consider.

    Although a lot heavier, the Titan has more power, and $10K +/- less. Unfortunately it needs Avgas if that is an issue. You can get a car gas compatible motor with less HP though.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Esser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    2,048

    Default Re: 915is Updates in the Kitfox?

    ULPower? Still surprised No One Has popped one in. I was going to until I got a deal on my engine. It’s lighter, costs the same as the titan I believe, and runs on auto fuel. The 130hp model would be waaay cheaper than the 915 and the titan. Looks like zenith is having good success with them
    ------------------
    Josh Esser
    Flying SS7
    Rotax 914iS
    AirMaster Prop

    Edmonton, AB, CWL3

  7. #7
    Senior Member colospace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Littleton, CO
    Posts
    322

    Default Re: 915is Updates in the Kitfox?

    When I last visited the factory some years back, there was a customer plane in the shop getting at least a partial FWF developed for its UL Power engine.
    - Gary
    S7 SuperSport Tri-gear
    w/Rotax 912, Oratex, Dynon

  8. #8
    Senior Member av8rps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Junction City, WI
    Posts
    680

    Default Re: 915is Updates in the Kitfox?

    Quote Originally Posted by Esser View Post
    ULPower? Still surprised No One Has popped one in. I was going to until I got a deal on my engine. It’s lighter, costs the same as the titan I believe, and runs on auto fuel. The 130hp model would be waaay cheaper than the 915 and the titan. Looks like zenith is having good success with them
    On the Highlander "wings forum" you can read about the struggles a builder went through installing and operating a UL 130 hp engine by searching for UL350. He eventually got it to work good, and out of fairness, in many regards it had some great attributes (simple, nice "aircraft type" sound, etc). But if you read all of "Stede52's posts on it, as my memory serves me, after he sold it he admits he wouldn't do the UL engine again. He admits a zippered/modified 912 will outperform it, be lighter, and burn less fuel. And as much as I hate to say it, those are common shortcomings when comparing against a 912, as to be truly effective it needs a PSRU as it turns higher rpm than a standard aircraft engine. So prop efficiency is just not in the same league as the 912.

    Fwiw, the 6 cylinder 130 hp Jabiru has similar performance. Non geared high revving engines just don't work well on STOL type aircraft. They will however work reasonably well on faster planes that typically use shorter props. But so will a 912.

    With all that said, I'll be surprised if the 915 doesn't provide outstanding performance. I agree it is a bit pricey, but I personally think it will get the job done that most other engines won't. Time will tell...
    Last edited by av8rps; 01-10-2018 at 08:06 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •