Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Hysol ??

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member jiott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    2,974

    Default Re: Hysol ??

    I agree, if it was me I think I would try to sand off most of the old Hysol on the wood. However, I wouldn't stress too much about it because the bond of ribs to spar is not a critical structural joint. The ribs only serve to space the spars one from another and to provide an airfoil shape for the skin (fabric) to adhere to. The Hysol is only there to keep the ribs from sliding around and getting out of position. Your critical structure is the spars, diagonal cross braces, and the lift struts.
    Jim Ott
    Portland, OR
    Kitfox SS7 flying
    Rotax 912ULS

  2. #2
    Senior Member jiott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    2,974

    Default Re: Hysol ??

    As was stated, the false ribs are a little different story because the Hysol is the only thing holding them in place, so I would be more concerned about a good Hysol to wood joint on them, even though they are not critical to flight. On the main ribs I would bet that if all the Hysol to wood joints were loose you would not notice a difference as long as the Hysol to spar joints were intact to keep the ribs in position.
    Jim Ott
    Portland, OR
    Kitfox SS7 flying
    Rotax 912ULS

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    642

    Default Re: Hysol ??

    I have to respectfully disagree with the comment that the rib to spar joint is not structurally critical. A significant amount of the airload applied to the wing fabric is transferred to the ribs, which in turn transfers the load to the spars. In our particular rib to spar joint geometry, the ribs interlock with the spars which forms a large part of that load transfer, however the Hysol provides stabilisation of the joint (eg prevents rib rotation) and also provides additional load capability. So I would say that the rib/spar junction are important to the manner in which loads are shared between covers, ribs and spars.
    Last edited by David47; 06-29-2017 at 06:01 AM.
    David
    SS7 Builder

  4. #4
    Senior Member Slyfox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    felts field, spokane
    Posts
    1,331

    Default Re: Hysol ??

    I remember reading once that you don't need the glue. ha, yes that's what I read. that the glue is mainly to hold things together until you get the covering on. I don't know if I would feel comfortable with that or not, but that's what I read. I think it might have been the original designer of the kitfox. but I remember reading such a thing is all I can say.
    steve
    slyfox
    model IV 1200-flying
    912uls
    IVO medium in-flight
    RV7A-flying
    IO-360
    constant speed prop

  5. #5
    Senior Member jrevens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    2,156

    Default Re: Hysol ??

    Quote Originally Posted by David47 View Post
    I have to respectfully disagree with the comment that the rib to spar joint is not structurally critical. A significant amount of the airload applied to the wing fabric is transferred to the ribs, which in turn transfers the load to the spars. In our particular rib to spar joint geometry, the ribs interlock with the spars which forms a large part of that load transfer, however the Hysol provides stabilisation of the joint (eg prevents rib rotation) and also provides additional load capability. So I would say that the rib/spar junction are important to the manner in which loads are shared between covers, ribs and spars.
    I absolutely agree, David.
    John Evens
    Arvada, CO
    Kitfox SS7 N27JE
    EAA Lifetime
    Chap. 43 honorary Lifetime

  6. #6
    Senior Member Esser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    2,048

    Default Re: Hysol ??

    Just to clarify in my post, I thought you might be ok leaving hysol on the false ribs as they aren't structural but to remove it all from the ribs.
    ------------------
    Josh Esser
    Flying SS7
    Rotax 914iS
    AirMaster Prop

    Edmonton, AB, CWL3

  7. #7
    Senior Member Slyfox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    felts field, spokane
    Posts
    1,331

    Default Re: Hysol ??

    I have a problem with your statement. wood is wood. if I know glue it will soak into the rib. I don't see any reason to try and get this out. just remove what you can and when you put the new on, it will bond to the old. just move on, don't be a perfectionist. it might bite you. meaning, if you remove the surface of the rib to get the old hysol off, you will more then likely remove rib material. just leave it and install and recover with the hysol.
    steve
    slyfox
    model IV 1200-flying
    912uls
    IVO medium in-flight
    RV7A-flying
    IO-360
    constant speed prop

  8. #8
    Senior Member jiott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    2,974

    Default Re: Hysol ??

    I figured my comments might stir up some interesting discussion. Just for the record, my statement about the glue joints not being a critical structural joint is not original with me; like Slyfox said I heard it somewhere else but can't remember where. Also I want to be clear that none of us including myself would even for a moment consider not gluing those joints. That said, I still believe the statement is true. Think about it; there are no lateral forces on the ribs, there are no twisting forces on the ribs because the spar/cross braces ladder structure is all locked in STRUCTURALLY by the aluminum parts and the steel lift struts, the ribs only have vertical forces applied by the lift on the attached fabric. These vertical forces are transferred to the spars at the points where the spars go thru the close fitting holes in the ribs. No glue is required to do this; it is just like a big bolt loaded in shear passing thru a plate (you don't glue in shear bolts). As I mentioned previously, the rib can do all of this as long as it is stable and doesn't move out of position or tip sideways. The fabric itself with the rib stitching will accomplish this, the glue is only a secondary backup. Again as I stated previously, as long as you have a good glue to spar joint on each side of the rib with a nice fillet up the side of the rib, the glue to wood joint could be totally disconnected and the ribs would still be held tightly in position and stable and transferring the lifting loads to the spars. If those holes thru the ribs for the spars were sloppy loose my argument would not be nearly as valid.

    Believe me I am not trying to be a know-it-all or to call others out as being right or wrong, its just fun to think about these things and to try and evaluate what we have heard.
    Jim Ott
    Portland, OR
    Kitfox SS7 flying
    Rotax 912ULS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •