Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: king kong 670

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Gainesville, tx
    Posts
    79

    Default Re: king kong 670

    Please forgive my ignorance. Since this is an experimental aircraft I am wondering if you had your AW done with a 582 and put in a 670 what had to happen FAA wise? does that entail a new AW from a DAR? new ops limits and 40hr phase 1? Does it effect the ability to get a condition inspection? Is it pretty straight forward and easily done? or is it typical govt red tape that takes a huge amount of time and headache to get done? I am under the impression that anyone can do the work but must have an a&p mechanic sign off on the log book. Just trying to find out what potential headaches I may have if I decided to do this in the future. Thanks Mark

  2. #12
    Super Moderator Av8r3400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Merrill, WI
    Posts
    3,044

    Default Re: king kong 670

    Changing the engine is a "major change" that would require notifying the FAA. Most likely this would also entail a period of phase 1 testing. This may be as little as 5 hours. Most likely more, due to the 670 not being a traditional "aircraft" engine.
    Av8r3400
    Kitfox Model IV
    The Mangy Fox
    912UL 105hp Zipper
    YouTube Videos

  3. #13

    Default Re: king kong 670

    If rotax rick use's your old engine to convert to 670, ie your old 582, it would still be the same engine wouldn't it? Iam asking because I dont know.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Gainesville, tx
    Posts
    79

    Default Re: king kong 670

    Thanks Av,
    That was my impression but a lot of guys seem to be changing so it must not be that big a deal with the faa. Do you need to go back and get a whole new AW cert? Or can you simply notify the Faa with whatever form they need and get an A&P to sign off on the work and put it into phase 1 for whatever the faa deems is appropriate? I was under the impression you had to reapply for AW with a DAR after said work was done since it is a "major repair" then get new ops limits with phase one requirements
    Mark

    Craig, Rick uses PARTS of the old engine that are interchangeable. Its more than simply slapping bigger pistons in a 582. Not trying to be a smart ass here but if you put a jeep bumper on a ford pinto it doesn't make it a Jeep. So even if you interchange 50% of the parts it is still a different motor. MANY parts are interchangeable in rotax engines from 447-582 but they are still different engines. I would be willing to bet a lot of money that the FAA will not allow that as a "minor change/repair"
    Last edited by tx_swordguy; 06-24-2015 at 10:02 AM.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Chisholm Mn
    Posts
    1,571

    Default Re: king kong 670

    You do not need an AnP to sign off your work, engine change or otherwise on an experimental. He only has to do the annual conditional inspection. Read your operating limitations that the DAR issued with the airworthiness certificate. It tells what you have to do to notify the FAA about a major change. Jim Chuk

  6. #16

    Default Re: king kong 670

    TXswordguy thanks I wasn't sure if it had the same serial number if that would count as same engine . that's why I asked. Oh and I didn't think you trying to be a smart---.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •