What does the Kitfox community think of Sport Aviation?

[Chad Jensen]

There has been a lot of discussion of Sport Aviation on several other boards, but none started by me...I thought I'd ask the community here what you all think of it? I am taking the lead for homebuilt coverage in the magazine now, and I like the vision we have developed for future stories...covering the people, what it took to get the project complete, challenges along the way, family and friend involvement, and of course, the airplane. That's a very condensed version of what we've spent several meetings developing...much more coming.

What say you?

[Dick B in KY]

I like it, but think it needs more how to articles on homebuilders projects. Something the average builder can relate to and has probably been faced with during construction. The Hints for Homebuilders is good, so don't get rid of it. By the way, I liked your article in the latest edition on your first test flight.

Dick B

[mr bill]

There should be more technical content, eg electrical, mechanical "how to" articles. Some woodworking, fabric work, steel tubing,welding and of course sheet metal construction.

[Chewie]

Chad,
I also enjoyed your article (Feb '12).

I'm too new to know much about homebuilding, but anything to bring new people in and provide a glimpse into the world of homebuilding, from research to purchasing to flight test like you just did, is great. If people want more specifics, they have many options to go into clubs and type-dedicated forums like this one.

Mark
EAA # I forget

[Av8r3400]

I have to admit I'm not really a fan of the "new and improved" Sport Aviation. I will continue to be a member due to my involvement on the local chapter level (Officer Chapter UL75 - 130+ members), but the mag is losing me.

I liked the old SA, like back in the 80s, for example. The focus of the content was technical and aircraft oriented. Building tips and tricks. Articles about the airplanes, not the owners life stories. (The Corsair article in February's issue for example: all people no plane.) And what's with all the pushing of the no-market, unusable electric airplanes? Some sort of Solyndra-esc green push?

Writers have been added from the non-experimental world who's contributions seem to have come right from Plane and Pilot or Flying magazine, with little or no relevance to the EAA world. Mostly about million dollar certified planes, IFR techniques and travel brochure photography. Soon to come the same old rehashed reviews of the "new" Archer or Skylane?

It seems like all kinds of off topic "fluff" has been added to the proportionately small amount of EAA-tech content to fill the coffee-table picture book that I get in the mail every month. Plus, who's idea was the over-sized "Life Magazine" format, anyway?

You guys just had a major "right sizing" of the staff over there at EAA-HQ. Now, maybe its time to do the same thing with the Magazine: Refocus.


In my opinion.

[ken nougaret]

i'll second what av8r3400 said. too much of the high cost certified aircraft and not enough for the little guy do it yourselfer. and the larger magazine doesn't stack well with the others.
ken