Travel in a Kitfox

[whitewulfe]

Oh and I know it isn't LSA but is ultralight in Canada, but correct me if I am wrong, it is a similar class?

Thanks
Brent

If google/wikipedia is correct, under the "Advanced Ultra-light Aeroplane" category, you're limited to a maximum take-off mass of 1,232lbs, and a minimum useful load of 400lbs (assuming 912ULS 100hp engine) or 390lbs (80hp 912). If I'm reading this correctly, a minimum of a recreational pilot's license is required to fly with a passenger, although I would personally recommend a private pilot's license simply because it allows you to fly internationally.

Using the previously quoted empty weight of 750lbs, the regulations would leave you with 482lbs total to work with, which would only allow 122lbs for baggage and fuel assuming two 180lb adults in the seats.

Given my previous recommendation for the private pilot's license, I'm of the belief one might as well spend the extra $200 for the 1,550lb gross weight landing gear and be able to fully utilize the additional 268lbs of useful load that a gross weight of 1,550lbs provides when compared to AULA operation.

The higher gross weight also allows for people like myself who weight a little more (I think I weigh in around 220lbs or so with typical clothing - joys of higher than average bone density: it seems almost impossible to break a bone, but you weigh more :P )

[bandit]

Yes u r correct, I had been informed from people that I assumed knew and they told me that Canada was at 1320lbs gross! I just checked the website and it is in fact 1232lbs! Damnit

Thanks for the tip, as I will probably have to forget about AULA I think!

Brent

[HighWing]

My son and his family live in St. Augustine, FL and we visit them sometimes three times a year. One of the best trips was the one where we drove, delivering a car. My wife reminds me that it was good because it was only one way. We saw country that we have never seen before and likely will never see again.

I use this as an example of Kitfox flying vs. other means of transportation. If time was no issue. Flying my Model IV would be a no brainer. Low and slow has to be the best way to enjoy the country and meet the people. I think I would Use maybe two full tank legs per day weather permitting and find lodging afternoon and evenings. Better yet, find a buddy that will fly along side - can't beat a group flight.

One of our Arizona pioneers flew all over the country and into Canada in his Safari putting almost a thousand hours on his airplane the first year. With the group I flew with, we sometimes camped, but mostly Hotelled it. Pack light, but with contingencies in mind. I still scan for ultralight camping gear. My tent weighs four pounds and my 20 degree sleeping bag weighs under two lbs. and packs smaller than a football. Use laundromats. It can become fatiguing so there will be ample time on the ground for domestic chores.

Go for it.

(photo of Ray's airplane)

Lowell

[desertfox1]

Thanks for the pic, Lowell. I was lucky enough to be Rays wingman
for some of that flying, including the Alaska portion. If you look hard
you can see my Vixen right behind his plane.

Phil

[HighWing]

Phil,
Your's, a classic. With a nose art highlight.
Lowell

[akarmy]

So last night I was reading the new Burt Rutan book that EAA put out called Race to Space. The part that caught my attention in relation to long cross country flying was the chapter on Voyager which flew around the world non stop at wait for it, 110mph. So what do we have to complain about?

[desertfox1]

Just checked the Log...2053 hours at 110-120 mph in
Kitfox. Coast to coast, Alaska, Canada..all the places
I've seen and the wonderful people I've met! The fun
I've had with my wingmen, only way to go.

Thank you!

Phil

[bandit]

Yes this is a challenging decision! I like both planes so much!
Highlander- Cargo area and STOL
Kitfox- Higher speed and still great STOL

Have to decide soon!

Brent