Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: Verner radial vs. Rotec radial

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Administrator DesertFox4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,566

    Default Re: Verner radial vs. Rotec radial

    Paulc , I am ok with people making comparisons on engines, props, avionics ect. and will allow a little ego a bragging into the posts as long as it is in fun however this is what gets my attention quickly:
    Allbee, I hope you didn’t choose your wife using that philosophy, ouch!
    . Even with a smiley face that seems personal. Now , back to radial engine equipped Kitfox's as they are yet a rarity and quite interesting.


    DesertFox4
    Admin.
    7 Super Sport
    912 ULS Tri-gear


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Dupuy,Qc
    Posts
    309

    Default Re: Verner radial vs. Rotec radial

    Do you think guy's ,the kitfox with rotec are ok with ski or float???

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Av8r3400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Merrill, WI
    Posts
    3,047

    Default Re: Verner radial vs. Rotec radial

    The Rotec is very heavy and requires the use of a wood prop. Neither are good things on a float plane...
    Av8r3400
    Kitfox Model IV
    The Mangy Fox
    912UL 105hp Zipper
    YouTube Videos

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Dupuy,Qc
    Posts
    309

    Default Re: Verner radial vs. Rotec radial

    I dont think the wood propeller was a problem with protection on leading edge..
    But for sure ,i love more a composite prop....for weight ..

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    paul
    Posts
    62

    Default Re: Verner radial vs. Rotec radial

    Weight is relative. The R2800 is about the same weight as an O-200 but dont forget the R2800 is powerful and geared to swing big props which are ideal for hauling off float planes.

    I cant see the engine weight being an issue at all, on the other hand the fat guts on some of the pilots I see is more alarming to me!

  6. #6
    Jenki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Zvolen, SLOVAKIA, EU
    Posts
    2

    Default Re: Verner radial vs. Rotec radial

    Some update about Verner radial as topic:
    Verner radials are not equipped by gearbox, bothe of them are direct driving propeller. The RPM is then 2300 maximum.

    Verner Motor Scarlett 5SI 4 stroke/5 cylinder/air cooled
    Maximum power: 83 HP (61 kW) @ 2200 RPM
    Max. continued power: 78 HP (57 kW) @ 1900 RPM
    Torque: 298 Nm (220 ft/lb) @ 1700 RPM
    Weight: 69 kg (152 lbs)

    Bore: 95 mm/ 3.74 inch
    Stroke: 102 mm / 4.02 inch
    Compression ratio: 1:7,3

    Verner Motor Scarlett 7Hi 4 stroke/7 cylinder/air cooled
    Maximum power: 117 HP (87 kW) @ 2300 RPM
    Max. continued power:97 HP (71 kW) @ 2000 RPM
    Torque: 363 Nm (268 ft/lb) @ 2300 RPM
    Weight: 81 kg (178 lbs)
    Bore: 95 mm/ 3.74 inch
    Stroke: 90 mm / 3.54 inch
    Compression ratio: 1:7,3

    Verner Motor Scarlett 7Si
    Maximum power: 137 HP (101 kW) @ 2200 RPM
    Max. continued power: 110 HP (82 kW) @ 2000 RPM
    Torque: 445 Nm (268 ft/lb) @ 2200 RPM
    Weight: 83 kg (182 lbs
    Bore: 95 mm/3.74 inch
    Stroke: 102 mm /4.02 inch
    Compression ratio: 1:7,3

    Link to manufacture is here:
    http://www.vernermotor.com/7H.html#

    I hope to install one... maube suitable for Rebel.

    I can't imagine such engine on my Stylus (sort of heritage KitFox and Avid), probably too big. But, one never know.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •