Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Light Sport vs. Experimental

  1. #1
    Senior Member Maverick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    295

    Cool Light Sport vs. Experimental

    Does anyone know if there is an advantage to registering a KF as an experimental that meets all the requirements of Light Sport Airplane? Many years ago someone from the EAA told me to register my first KF as an experimental that meets LSA parameters (as in the J3). However, I had an 0200 on it with 1550 spars so I didn't make it LSA compliant.

    Is there any advantage one way or another. Reading about the insurance in that thread got me to thinking about this again since I do have a PP license, I believe that I can fly it as a LSA without having to get a medical again but I wonder about the advantages versus disadvantages either way.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    469

    Default Re: Light Sport vs. Experimental

    If the plane EVER registered above 1320 GW it can NEVER be lowered to comply with LSA. If your initial registration list it at 1550, unfortunately, you are out of luck.

    Having said that, I have heard rumors from factory people that there is talk of eventually raising the GW of LSA. Is it true? No idea...to me it is just a tumor.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Maverick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    295

    Default Re: Light Sport vs. Experimental

    Thank you but, I am not seeking to lower the GW of my first KF5. I am asking if it would be advantages to apply for registration as experimental over experimental LSA.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Pittsboro,NC
    Posts
    299

    Default Re: Light Sport vs. Experimental

    I believe EAB is the way to go. ELSA must be built exactly per plans. Kitfox is the builder. You or future owner may take a 16 hour class for a repairmans certificate. Under EAB, you are the builder. You are the only person eligible for the repairmans certificate. You may make any mods you like as long as they don't take it outside LSA limits. James Thomas

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    469

    Default Re: Light Sport vs. Experimental

    Quote Originally Posted by Maverick View Post
    Thank you but, I am not seeking to lower the GW of my first KF5. I am asking if it would be advantages to apply for registration as experimental over experimental LSA.
    Apologies!! After rereading your post I understand this is for another build.
    In this case, jrthomas gave a great answer. The caveat from my understanding on building it as ELSA is that an mod must be factory approved and possibly need associated signage (paperwork). I was recently at a competitors factory posing nearly identical questions on the hopes of a future purchase. Really not sure what the market will be for a plane that meets the ESLA vs. EAB yet still be LSA compliant. The Basic Meds has seemed to allowed many Light SPort guys (gals) head back to the old standards....172's etc.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    milwaukee wi
    Posts
    490

    Default Re: Light Sport vs. Experimental

    Over a year ago EAA President Jack Pelton told our Chapter 18 group that EAA and FAA were discussing extending the LSA weight limit to 1700 pounds. I asked him how likely it is that it would pass and what the time frame was. He said flatly that it will pass and expected it to happen in a year and a half. So far we have heard nothing. Maybe the FAA privatization has them side tracked.

  7. #7
    Senior Member aviator79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM
    Posts
    913

    Default Re: Light Sport vs. Experimental

    Quote Originally Posted by jrthomas View Post
    I believe EAB is the way to go. ELSA must be built exactly per plans. Kitfox is the builder. You or future owner may take a 16 hour class for a repairmans certificate. Under EAB, you are the builder. You are the only person eligible for the repairmans certificate. You may make any mods you like as long as they don't take it outside LSA limits. James Thomas
    jrthomas is correct that the ELSA must be build exactly per the plans. It can, however, be modified after original certification without the manufacturer's approval.

    One thing to note is that Kitfox has chosen not to market an ELSA kit. To certify yours as ELSA, you would need for them to provide you with a statement of compliance for your kit. (21.193(e)(4)). I don't know if that's something that they do.

    ELSA advantage: Future owners can take a repairman course to do the annual condition inspection.

    E-AB advantages: Possibly easier certification. Can be modified outside of LSA restrictions. (although, as WWHunter points out, once this is done, it can never be an LSA again.)

    Basically, the differences are so minor, that the path of least resistance is probably your best bet. (E-AB)
    --Brian
    Flying - S7SS

  8. #8
    Super Moderator Av8r3400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Merrill, WI
    Posts
    3,044

    Default Re: Light Sport vs. Experimental

    Quote Originally Posted by mr bill View Post
    Over a year ago EAA President Jack Pelton told our Chapter 18 group that EAA and FAA were discussing extending the LSA weight limit to 1700 pounds. I asked him how likely it is that it would pass and what the time frame was. He said flatly that it will pass and expected it to happen in a year and a half. So far we have heard nothing. Maybe the FAA privatization has them side tracked.



    I wouldn't hold your breath for this to happen. Especially now with basic med having been passed, the FAA has no reason to go through the hassle and expense to change LSA.
    Last edited by Av8r3400; 05-21-2018 at 09:33 AM.
    Av8r3400
    Kitfox Model IV
    The Mangy Fox
    912UL 105hp Zipper
    YouTube Videos

  9. #9
    Senior Member Maverick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    295

    Default Re: Light Sport vs. Experimental

    Thanks for all the responses. I agree with the notion that the GW for LSA should be higher and always felt that take of and landing speeds should have a greater consideration than GW but, what the FAA thinks is... oh, I forgot, thinking logically has never been their strong suit.

    EAB it is.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •