Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Back in the air?

  1. #11
    Senior Member Monocock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    226

    Default Re: Back in the air?

    Chargerbill,

    Something tells me you aren't a fan of the Rotax!!


  2. #12

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Delaware, Ohio
    Posts
    9

    Default Re: Back in the air?

    Update:
    I flew an Evektor today. Equipped with the Rotax 912s. Wow, I am shocked at the performance!
    An update for the Rotax Mafia out there!
    http://www.evektor.com/sportstar/

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Delaware, Ohio
    Posts
    9

    Default Re: Back in the air?

    Monocock,
    I didn't have an opinion one way or the other, until today. I was truly impressed with Rotax!
    I'm going to explore a Jab as well. Although, I really do like the appearance of the Rotec...
    Simplicity is what I'm really looking for. Of the three I'm considering (Rotec, Rotex, Jab) The Rotex is the most complex.
    When its all said and done, I'll probably get the Rotec 2800. It makes a damn good looking airplane!

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Delaware, Ohio
    Posts
    9

    Default Re: Back in the air?

    C5Engineer,
    A friend (Jessup) was a C-5 FE, I believe he transferred to Travis after leaving Altus...what a cool plane to!
    My ole KC-10 was transferred to Travis (6031) from Seymour-Johnson in the 90's...and I went to McGuire. The plane definately recieved the better assignment!

  5. #15
    Senior Member HighWing's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Goodyear, AZ
    Posts
    1,743

    Default Re: Back in the air?

    Like Dorsal, this is just some observations on "simpliciity". First, the Rotec is fairly new especially as far as factory support. I think the guys that go that route, will be beta testers on the engine and that is never simple. The Rotax 912 series have been around since the early 90s and on Kitfoxes since about that time. With the Rotax, there is really nothing new under the sun and tons of experience and help in this forum and elsewere. In my opinion, there can be nothing simpler than the water cooled Rotax. I just installed the cooling system on a Series V and it took a day. It took that long because I changed out the SS straps for the radiator mount to 4130 and paint needed to dry. Three years ago, I put in the baffeling on an IO-540 in a Lancair-IV, and that is a several day challenge if you want nutplates for easier removeal for annuals. Then you get to replace baffles from time to time as they wear and crack. The Jab has fiberglass baffling which I understand is pretty nice, but still you have to remove it for annuals and I have no idea if the installation would beat the cooling sytem in the Rotax.

    flying? With the Kitfox, no problem diving down the canyon to the river side strip - shock cooling not an issue. With the Rotec, it is new and you will have to decide if it is the engine for you for the long haul. I guess my prejudice is showing, but my guess is that there is in excess of a half million hours in Rotax engines pulling Kitfoxes, likely less than 1,000 with Rotec (maybe less than 500) and probably 10-15,000 in Jabaru.

    What ever it is, Go for it!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •