Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Jabiru 3300

  1. #11
    Senior Member War Eagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Nampa Id
    Posts
    257

    Default Re: Jabiru 3300

    While the gear box reduces the engine speed so it can keep the prop tip speed at a reasonable number it also multiples the torque out put of the engine.

    As an example: if your engine generates 100 hp and 50 ftlbs of torque at 5800 rpm and you add a gear box with a 3:1 ratio then you now have 150 ftlbs or torque delivered to the prop. Horsepower doesn't change but the torque to drive the prop is multiplied by the gear ratio.

  2. #12
    Senior Member jrevens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    2,146

    Default Re: Jabiru 3300

    Quote Originally Posted by Av8r3400 View Post
    Over 40,000 of them sold with millions of hours of flight time would disagree with that.

    I can't understand why these engines are hated so much for being efficient and reliable.
    I agree... they're "torqueier"- will turn more prop for their weight & horsepower than just about any of the competition & hence outperform in climb & cruise, perhaps the lightest weight "package" available, ceramic coated cylinders giving very low oil consumption & negligible wear throughout their life, 2000 hr TBO with examples going far longer before teardown, absence of shock-cooling issues... I could go on & on. I never knew too much about them & therefore wasn't a big fan, but I'm convinced that they are a great engine now.

    Sorry if this post should be in the Rotax category
    John Evens
    Arvada, CO
    Kitfox SS7 N27JE
    EAA Lifetime
    Chap. 43 honorary Lifetime

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    336

    Default Re: Jabiru 3300

    The Jabiru is a great engine. Runs smoother, simple to maintain, and has great power without a gear reduction, multiple carbs, cooling system, etc to worry about.

    I investigated my options before spending $20k plus on an engine. Hopefully you have figured out that the Rotax is not the lightest package by any stretch of the imagination, nor is it cheap to operate over a 10 year period. Look at fuel consumption, annuals, and overhauls in the total picture. Reliability is equal since neither engine is causing planes to fall out of the sky. I think the rotax is passed over by those of us that hate a PSRU and high maintenance costs.

    OBTW - you can hand prop a Jab in the back country if your battery goes dead.

    The single most expensive purchase will be your engine. It costs more than a kit so be careful. Like the plane, you will have to live with your decision. Forget about shock cooling and step climbing. IMHO, anytime you are zoom climbing or quickly descending you are flying unsafe. Just because a rotax handles those two scenarios better doesn't make that sort of flight safe.

  4. #14
    Senior Member Dorsal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Central, MA
    Posts
    1,511

    Default Re: Jabiru 3300

    I hope we can keep this thread civil as it is a good discussion. As Tim pointed out your engine is a big investment so folks get pretty passionate about their decisions. I, for one, am glad there are options, the more the better. Which is best is likely to be one of those debates that will go on forever hopefully with ocasional new choices thrown into the mix. I chose the Rotax because it was the most common and best understood power plant for this plane. I also don't like having a reduction unit but it does provide one solution for the following engineering challenge. To optimise the prop based on desired performance envelope will result in the best length, pitch and RPM. To optimise an engine for best HP/weight and other considerations will also result in a best RPM it just wont be the same as the best RPM for the prop. A direct drive engine will compromise these two in exchange for simplicity (a very real advantage in an airplane engine). Consider the following relationship (this has a bunch of hand waving but I believe basically correct). For constant tip speed and static thrust HP needs to increase linearly with the prop RPM at which it is produced. This is to say that if you have 20% more HP at 20% higher prop RPM (and therefor a 20% shorter prop) it should be about a wash in static thrust.
    Last edited by Dorsal; 11-04-2012 at 06:23 AM.
    Dorsal ~~^~~
    Series 7 - Tri-Gear
    912 ULS Warp Drive

  5. #15
    kitfox5v's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Winnsboro SC
    Posts
    75

    Default Re: Jabiru 3300

    Dorsal, Thanks for the info. That is why I started the thread. I just want all the info I can get. This is for sure the 2nd biggest investment on our project. Or as may wife said, the reason she upped my life ins. as you said, hope we can keep this civil because some rotax people are closed minded on this subject. Thanks again, Eddie

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Chisholm Mn
    Posts
    1,562

    Default Re: Jabiru 3300

    Not wanting to quibble about things, but a few posts back it was mentioned that you can hand prop a Jabiru. The standard Jabiru ignition needs about 300 RPM to make spark. I know I was never able to spin my 2200 that fast by hand. Kind of interesting though, the 582 Rotax also needs about 300 rpm to make spark. Having the gear box will let you hand prop it if you really flip it fast. Good thing to, my battery was nearly dead today, and so I fired it up by hand. Got some nice flying in afterall! Take care, Jim Chuk

    PS I've never heard of anyone handproping a 912 even though it has a gearbox. Anyone done it?

  7. #17
    Administrator DesertFox4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,563

    Default Re: Jabiru 3300

    PS I've never heard of anyone handproping a 912 even though it has a gearbox. Anyone done it?
    Yes. I've done it twice on the 80 hp but that was before I read you couldn't do it. Now of course I wouldn't even try. I was much younger then too.
    BTW, I've been living with my Rotax decission for 14 years and 2,500 plus hours of reliable, cost effective , fuel efficient, low maintenance very enjoyable flight. My engine decission worked out great. Hope yours does too.


    DesertFox4
    Admin.
    7 Super Sport
    912 ULS Tri-gear


  8. #18
    Super Moderator Av8r3400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Merrill, WI
    Posts
    3,044

    Default Re: Jabiru 3300

    I wouldn't even want to try hand-proping a 912. They say a minimum of 200 rpm to make the Ducati boxes fire. Besides with the style of charging system these motors use, you need some battery to make it charge. Running without a battery in the loop will ruin the rectifier/regulator.

    I don't know how the Jabs work, but you can prop a 2-stroke Rotax. A member of our chapter has a 503 powered Ridge Runner and he always props it. Here it is being done by one of our own (DaveF) on a 582.



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W867v6beoo4
    Av8r3400
    Kitfox Model IV
    The Mangy Fox
    912UL 105hp Zipper
    YouTube Videos

  9. #19
    Administrator DesertFox4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,563

    Default Re: Jabiru 3300

    The batteries were not totally dead on the two I did it on but not enough charge to turn them through the compression stroke. Don't try it Larry, at our age we're both too slow to get out of the way if/when it starts now.


    DesertFox4
    Admin.
    7 Super Sport
    912 ULS Tri-gear


  10. #20

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    3133 moranza commerce mi 48390
    Posts
    39

    Default Re: Jabiru 3300

    Did a complete tear down and inspection of my 912 ul with 1829 hours on the hobbs. The only component that measured out of spec was the gear box thrust washer. (old style brass washer) lots of lead build up. My only complaint from the engine is alittle rough running at certain r.p.m`s. My model 3 with a 912 and ivo inflight prop will out perform my friends speedster with a jabiru. The Jabiru sounds sweet, very smooth running. More of a simple engine.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •