Re: Actual time to build SS-7
My Stroker C-85 weighed in at 200# w/carb &w/o exh.(and thats with Bendix mags which are heavier than Slicks). I put a lightweight B&C starter (7#) on it also. I am with you, if you have a problem out in the boonies or away from home, you cannot hand prop it, or easily repair it. I would consider the O-233 Lyc even though it would bring the EW up to about 878 according to John Mc. He mentioned this morning to me, the Lyc worked out fine, but was just about 80-90# heavier.
Re: Actual time to build SS-7
I was told that you can't hand prop a 912. To me it was the biggest drawback to the engine, and I always believed it to be the case.
I landed on a gravel bar one day, and saw a buddy flying over turned on the master to talk him into coming down. Went for a little hike came back to the plane. Guess what somebody left the master on. Dead battery I figured it can't hurt to try hand propping it. The sucker started right up. Since then I've it done it two other times. It starts as easy as a c85 does. Made a little piece that holds the choke out for doing it cold. Now that I know this I'm more careful pulling the prop through.
After typing this I searched youtube and found a video of someone hand propping a Rotax 912. This guy has a two blade mine is a three blade.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JUBrHYsh4E
Re: Actual time to build SS-7
I have hand propped my 912UL, too. I also fly a Taylorcraft with an A-65 which has to be hand propped every time, so when my Kitfox wouldn't start one day, I didn't have a second thought about spinning it to life. Reading the manual later I found out that I couldn't do that.
I admit the T-craft is much easier, and propping the kitfox is scary but it can be done.
Louie
Re: Actual time to build SS-7
The hand propping is a question i had always wondered, I was also under the impression it couldn't be done, this is great news. What about the injected 912? Less likely?,
Re: Actual time to build SS-7
From discussions over the last few years on hand propping, it is my understanding that a 912 ul 80 hp engine is possible to hand prop, the higher compression 912 uls is not, I would think the SI would be the same .
Re: Actual time to build SS-7
With enough force on the prop I see no reason the ULS can not be hand propped like a UL. It will just take a stronger pull-through to overcome the higher compression. All you need is 200 crank RPM to get the ignitions to fire.
The IS motor, being fuel injected, requires electricity to run the pumps to pressurize the fuel rails so hand propping probably won't have any need unless the starter motor has failed.